Marxism’s hatred for true Christianity can nowhere more clearly be seen than in its seemingly never-ending assault on Christian morality. All worldview systems are theocratic in nature; the essence of the struggle of the Marxist worldview is nothing but an attempt at the displacement of the Christian theos with the Marxist theos. Nevertheless, despite that neither true Marxism nor true Christianity acknowledges the existence of neutral ground, the most effective strategy Marxism employs against Christianity is implementing a “Christian” Marxism, whereby it has successfully managed to destroy Christianity in the West from the inside out. True Marxists, despite knowing very well that Christianity and Marxism are mutually exclusive, willfully employ this long-term strategy aimed at the destruction of Christianity. Their success has been astounding – most people today who claim to be Christians in virtually all Western European countries, the United States, Australia, and South Africa are in reality not Christians but Marxists, and their worldview and morality reflect this.
One of the moral commandments Marxism hates, but all those who love Christ will necessarily obey, is the tenth of the Decalogue: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male servant, or his female servant, or his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor’s.”
As true rights are the mirror image of duties (without which true rights can never exist), the rights which can be derived from this commandment are the right to private property, to heterosexual monogamy, to the employment of servants, and to the use of the earth’s resources for the cultivation thereof. The duties reflected in this commandment are contentment with one’s possessions, loyalty in all godly relationships, charity towards one’s neighbor, and good stewardship of the gifts entrusted by God. Both the greed of corporatist capitalism and the institutional theft of socialism are to be rejected on the grounds of the tenth commandment. The duties of the civil magistrate under this commandment involve the protection of full private property rights, in addition to the protection of traditional marriage.
The Marxist worldview assaults all of these rights and duties. Although the assault of Marxism seems to be relatively easy to identify, many Christians, after having been trained from childhood in the Marxist worldview, have syncretistically bowed the knee to the Marxist god by embracing their theology of envy. This is manifested in “Christian” Marxists’ support of homosexual “marriage” in the civil sphere, a step motivated by the abominations’ envy of the virtuous state in which a heterosexual married couple is allowed to be engaged under God’s Law. This is manifested also by the displacement of a nation with mass immigration, where the immigration is motivated by an envy for what God has providentially withheld from one nation but given to another. One of the greatest codifications of Marxist theology is the Belhar Confession, already adopted to become part of the confessional basis of the apostate Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa back in 2011. In Belhar’s assertion that God specially relates with the poor and oppressed simply by the poverty and oppression they have suffered, it advocates a heretical, Marxist, and Christ-less soteriology, making envy into a virtue.
Among the “works of the flesh” mentioned by Paul in Galatians 5:19-21 is envy. It is rather amusing that the fifth chapter of Galatians, a Pauline letter so often abused by antinomians to justify their heresy, is one of the most explicitly theonomic chapters in the whole Bible. When it mentions Christian virtues, it explicitly notes that they accord with God’s law (verse 23), while the works of the flesh are all prohibited by God’s law. Notably absent from Paul’s list of vices, which he characteristically employs in accordance with the Hellenistic rhetorical traditions of his time, are the fake sins invented by the Marxist haters of God’s Law: “prejudice,” “racism,” and “homophobia,” among others.
The Marxist agenda is all about fueling the envy of those less blessed by God. This is what forcing egalitarianism upon Western nations is all about. Egalitarianism might appeal to humanistic sentimentalism, but in reality it has nothing to do with Christianity and in no way contributes to the advancement of humanity. God has not blessed all men equally. The first people, Adam and Eve, were not created equal (I Timothy 2:13), and Christ has made it abundantly clear that He has purposefully not blessed all of mankind equally (Matt. 25:14-30). Egalitarianism not merely fails to be an orthodox Christian doctrine, but is evidently refuted in the nature of reality, which re-proclaims the scriptural witness.
As an egalitarian society is held forth as the ultimate ideal for mankind, the have-nots are by default encouraged to envy those who have, since envy becomes a virtuous means to establish this “utopian” equality, i.e. the means by which man enters Marxist heaven. Once inequality is viewed as an evil, God is denied to be the ultimate Giver of all gifts, and what Scripture describes as “every good gift and perfect gift” which comes from the hand of “the Father of lights” (Jam. 1:17), becomes “human rights” that are denied by those who have to those who have not. This is where egalitarianism and Christianity are irreconcilable, since in order to be an egalitarian, one must be an atheist for all practical purposes – or rather, replace the scriptural God with a foreign theos.
Practically speaking, embracing envy as a virtue powers the drive to reduce everything to the level of the inferior. A very vivid example of this is racial integration. Racial integration is, after all, rooted in a discontentment with one’s own estate, precisely what is forbidden in the tenth commandment. Much like homosexuality, miscegenation itself is also an expression of this discontentment, since it is a deliberate attempt to alter a God-given racial and cultural identity through your progeny. Taking into account that one of the chief purposes of marriage is the creation of a future generation, and that God has purposefully designed creation in such a way that the racial identity of parents is necessarily reflected in their children, taking a spouse from another race is clearly rooted in both an envy for the characteristics of that particular race and a discontentment with one’s own racial identity.
One of the earliest expressions of this sort of Kinism in the Christian church was by the third-century church father, St. Cyprian, bishop of Carthage. Cyprian used the reality and value of race, the joy to be found in racial contentment, as an analogy for explaining how God finds joy in remaking us in His image through His Spirit: “If it is a source of joy and glory to men to have children like to themselves – and it is more agreeable to have begotten an offspring then when the remaining progeny responds to the parent with like lineaments – how much greater is the gladness in God the Father, when any one is so spiritually born that in his acts and praises the divine eminence of race is announced!”1
It doesn’t matter how much Marxists “educate” the West that race is only skin-deep; in practice the immigration of non-whites to an area always leads to an increase in crime and also destroys the previous trust there was between members of the homogeneous community. Therefore, in practice, the only way for the goals of multiculturalism to be achieved is for the native population to compromise their culture and identity to fit into the new multicultural hellhole created by the Marxists’ neo-Babelism. I will not hesitate to say that this is always and necessarily the result.
Ever since the ideas from the 1960s neo-Marxist revolutions overwhelmed South Africa in the ’90s, virtually every South African in my generation has viewed the problem created by multiculturalism in the method with which it is approached rather than in the presupposition from which it springs. If one were to even dare to say that multiculturalism is bad in itself, one would be shunned and cast out from any further discussion. The only discussion allowed is to find a better method of racial integration; questioning its premises is completely taboo. The reason such anti-Marxist sentiments are not tolerated in South Africa and the West is because they constitute blasphemy against the Marxist god and its core commandments. Racial integration and the extinction of boundaries are presuppositionally accepted by most people, in the same way that Christians accept God’s Word to be true. This makes reform within the current system near impossible, so the only option for Christian nationalists is to completely break from the mainstream and propose a radical alternative. Unfortunately, this also entails breaking the bonds of brotherhood with “Christian” Marxists: regarding as unbelievers and enemies of the true faith those who claim to be Christian. They must be so regarded, for despite their profession, they actively and aggressively advocate in word and deed the destruction of Christendom and the very people whom Christ had ordained to be His instruments in the advancement of His Gospel and Kingdom for the past two millennia.
Contentment with our estate is an end towards which the Church and its members, in obedience to the tenth commandment, should always strive – and this is exactly what Kinism teaches and practices. By embracing a traditionalist worldview, we express our contentment with the state in which God has called us (I Cor. 7:24) in terms of our distinct physical existence, distinct positions in society, and distinct roles within God’s Church. Kinism, or Christian ethno-nationalism, is an expression of orthodox and historical Christianity, and a thorough knowledge of its principles is vital to engage in much-needed polemics against the various manifestations of the Marxist heresy during our time.
Footnotes
| Tweet |
|
|
|
