In another exhibit of peak Clown World, retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens recently wrote a N.Y. Times opinion piece calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. Not just limits on AR-15s or bump stocks, but a repeal of the entire Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Though his fellow travelers are hemming and hawing over whether the old kook had shown too much leg in public, which is hypocritical and hilarious in this world where the once-unthinkable has now become the unassailable, his idea isn’t without support among the “coalition of the ascendant” that makes up the Democratic Party. One-fifth of the U.S. population supports a repeal of the Second Amendment, including 30% of blacks, 27% of Hispanics, and 39% of Democrats.
There are gun owners of every race, gender, and political persuasion. The NRA goes out of its way to cuck to blacks and feminists on this account. However, as of 2017 the Pew Research Center found that,
White men are especially likely to be gun owners: About half (48%) say they own a gun, compared with about a quarter of white women and nonwhite men (24% each) and 16% of nonwhite women.
The 2017 study showed that twice as many white households as Hispanic households had guns in them, and 50% more white households had guns than black households. A majority of rural households had firearms, and nearly half of Western, Midwestern, and Southern households did. Men also own firearms at a much higher rate than women — 39% to 22%.
Based on its 2013 study of the same topic, Pew said:
Roughly three-quarters (74%) of gun owners are men, and 82% are white. Taken together, 61% of adults who own guns are white men.
Interestingly, Pew’s 2013 and 2017 numbers differed on whether there was a major difference in gun ownership rates across the educational spectrum. According to the 2013 study, those with higher education were slightly more likely to own guns than those who had a high school diploma or less. But when Pew broke down its 2017 numbers to focus on whites, only 26% of white kids who had survived four years of college professors’ indoctrination owned guns, compared to 42% of those who did a little college and 40% of those who had a high school diploma or less.
There’s a good side, and a bad side, to these statistics. The good side is that white men are armed and thus more capable of defending themselves and their liberties than not. We should encourage white men, women, and children to own firearms and to safely train with them for recreation, sport, and self-defense.
However, in the wake of the Parkland school shooting these statistics have also been used by anti-whites to attack whites through an assault on the Second Amendment. They used these arguments a few years back when Sandy Hook happened, and before that they probably broke out these arguments after other school shootings.
Stevens’s recent call for repealing the Second Amendment is simply a dying man’s last request. Like many a shabbos goy and useful idiot, Stevens is paving the way for his non-white, non-heterosexual masters to achieve their ends. Though leftists in positions of institutional power are feigning shock and horror over Stevens’ essay, they did the same regarding calls for gay marriage a decade ago and will follow up Stevens’ essay with the same Soros-funded, minority-driven, media-protected ground game that resulted in the end of heterosexual normalcy in 2015. We should expect nothing less. God told us that liars lie, and they will do so until the end of days. Gird up thy loins.
The push to limit access to firearms and ammunition is an implicit — and sometimes explicit — attack on white men and their families. It is a key step on the road to white genocide in the United States. The civil right to own firearms, and the economic ability of whites to purchase them and train with them while still housing and feeding their families, is one of the last things preventing the United States from becoming Zimbabwe or South Africa. Other key protections would include our demographic strength, and our willingness to use our arms to collectively defend ourselves — which is notably lacking at present.
We all know that when Communists take away the guns of their opposition, it is so that the Communists can exercise a monopoly on the use of force. Enemies of the Communist bloc have been brainwashed, tortured, raped, murdered, and genocided throughout the sordid history of the Jewish-led ideology. This is not really debatable, though almost all patriotards sadly are more keen on blaming Nazis for gun control (thanks to retarded claims) than they are on opposing the actual purveyors of gun bans: leftists, Jews, feminists, sodomites, blacks, anti-racists, and other Communist allies.
Gun rights therefore ought to be considered a key issue in the pro-white movement. Even conservatives understand that the Second Amendment is the one that protects all the other rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Take away a man’s ability to forcibly defend his liberty to speak, worship, evangelize, assemble, own property, and protect his family — and that man becomes an automaton in a dystopian prison. We are under attack by the ruling powers in our culture. The leftists who slyly position us as both mentally ill victims and armed villains know this. We ought to resist by defending the Second Amendment from a pro-white perspective. Not just by joining gun rights organizations, which is fine in itself, but by advocating for guns as an integral part of a healthy white lifestyle. We should encourage their safe and effective use in hunting, target shooting, self-defense, collective defense, and any other healthy purpose. Preservation of our lives, liberties, and property in this fallen world requires the use of force. Just as we should promote healthy bodies, healthy relationships, deep faith, and sound minds, the pro-white movement should include gun rights as one of its essential agenda items.
| Tweet |
|
|
|
