The Church of England is the spiritual mother of many of the West’s great institutions and leaders. Its American branch, the Episcopal Church, was the home of George Washington, John Jay, Robert E. Lee, and other great WASP heroes of old America. From the Church of England came the Methodist movement and the founders of the Methodist Church, John and Charles Wesley. From Methodism came a host of Holiness, Pentecostal, and non-denominational churches.
Elsewhere, the Church of England was the British Empire’s spiritual counterpart. Large Anglican church bodies on the Indian subcontinent, the East Indies, and Africa still pledge their allegiance to the Archbishop of Canterbury as the honorary spiritual father of their own Anglican provinces. Like the British Commonwealth, the Anglican Communion is a non-binding but deeply meaningful union of independent peoples linked by their having played a part in the former British Empire. As an English-led movement, the Anglican Communion is headed by the words and example of the Archbishop of Canterbury, who is the chief cleric of the Church of England.
So what happens when the Anglican Communion no longer can look to the Church of England for spiritual guidance? The reality is that this is a real question non-homo Anglicans worldwide are facing. The Church of England is fully invested in anti-Christian, anti-white, feminist, perversion. It literally sanctifies it — as if reenacting the Old Testament-era Baal cults were a good idea!
The Church of England has rejected a proposal for a new service to mark a congregant’s sex change – but has given the nod to using an existing ‘reaffirmation’ baptism service, instead.
The Bishop of Norwich, the Rt Revd Graham James, said: “The Church of England welcomes transgender people and wholeheartedly wishes for them to be included in the life of the Church.
“On the matter of whether a new service is needed, the House of Bishops has decided that the current service that is used to affirm baptism can be adapted.
“Clergy always have the discretion to compose and say prayers with people as they see fit.”
This comes a few months after the Church of England advised that schools should let kids experiment with their gender identities. You wouldn’t want to bullycide potential queer voters, now would you, goy?
A remnant of faithful white Anglicans has held out and reorganized to fight against the apostasy of the rainbow flag-waving crazies. Sadly they too are cucked and blind to the other errors of our day such as multiculturalism, feminism, and Zionism, which means that even among that remnant there may not be much good that remains. With the apostasy of the Church of England and other historically-white provinces of the Anglican Communion, the small numbers of white, Bible-believing Anglicans remaining in the West have had to look to the Third World to represent their interests in the worldwide Anglican Communion. Even while forming their own less-liberal denominations such as the Anglican Church of North America, white cuckservative Anglicans have had to depend on recognition from their non-white brethren for street cred. This dynamic of white dependency on blacks and browns has only exacerbated the white guilt and racial cuckoldry of the non-LGBTQ crowd in the Anglican Communion. These cucked white Anglicans hope for a Third World-led renewal of traditional Christian morality and doctrine in large part because of the apostasy of their own countrymen and national church leaders. But non-white Anglicans have a predisposition to hate white people. White guilt and white genocide always end up in their theologies and in their ecclesiastical politics. Also, the likelihood of Third World Anglicans leading a renewal movement is nil. Third Worlders may preserve the faith as it was passed down to them under colonial rule, but non-Western peoples simply aren’t built with innovation in their genes the way that Western peoples are. You want inventions, you look to white men. You want a Reformation in the Church, you look to white men. The Islamic, pagan, and/or communist argument against Christianity as the “white man’s religion” will win out. Non-white Christian churches will exist, but they will not break out of their boxes as places where a vestige of Western Christianity used to thrive. So yes, there will be non-white Christians in the world, but no, they won’t lead a global revival. They’ll hold onto what we taught them, modify it to suit their purposes as they’ve always done when the white man is removed from leadership, and stagnate. That’s the story of post-miscegenation South America and the post-colonial Third World.
As for the historically-white provinces of the Anglican Communion, the likelihood of apostate Baal-worshippers realizing the error of their ways and leading the Church of England, the Episcopal Church, the Anglican Churches in Australia and Canada, et al. back to the old paths is less than nil. Technically the British monarch is the head of the Church of England, which means that in a few years the future King Charles will be the first King of England to publicly defend not only Christianity but Islam as “Defender of Faith.” These demon-led traitors who despise their heroes, their heritage, and their Lord will only push for evil further and faster as their heyday comes to an ignominious close. You know you’re a moron when sub-Saharan Africans know better than you on obvious truths like the sinfulness of homosexuality and the insanity of gender fluidity. Worse yet is when you’re an Episcopalian led further down the path of white genocide and perversion by your sub-Saharan African archbishop.
Other mainline Protestant denominations are going to hell in a handbasket too. It’s not just the Anglicans. But when the official church of America’s maternal country is lost, there’s not much hope left — at least not in that institution. As an ecclesiastical tradition Anglicanism still offers much to us today, but its institutions are lost. We are wise to seek to rebuild our own churches on solid ground.
| Tweet |
|
|
|
