Whatever grim portents may attend the prospect of a Trump administration, Ann Coulter has summed up the situation facing America in the 2016 election cycle, “If Hillary wins, we’re gonna be overwhelmed with refugees, with immigrants, um, that’s it. It’s lights out for America.”
Which is reminiscent of the opening paragraph of John Knox’s great work, The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women:
Wonder it is, that amongst so many pregnant wits as the isle of Great Britain has produced, so many godly and zealous preachers as England did sometime nourish, and amongst so many learned, and men of grave judgment, as this day by Jezebel are exiled, none is found so stout of courage, so faithful to God, nor loving to their native country, that they dare admonish the inhabitants of that isle, how abominable before God is the empire or rule of a wicked woman (yea, of a traitress and bastard); and what may a people or nation, left destitute of a lawful head, do by the authority of God’s word in electing and appointing common rulers and magistrates. That isle (alas!) for the contempt and horrible abuse of God’s mercies offered, and for the shameful revolting to Satan from Christ Jesus, and from his gospel once professed, does justly merit to be left in the hands of their own counsel, and so to come to confusion and bondage of strangers.
Even if we were speaking of the exceedingly rare Deborah archetype, the scripture makes plain that the ascendance of a woman over the nation, even in the case of Deborah herself, is a great shame to the nation (Judges 4:9). What’s more, the prophet Isaiah held gynocracy to be nothing short of a curse, saying, “As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths” (Isa. 3:12).
And if gynocracy is then conceived to be a judgment even in the case of necessity and under a virtuous woman, how much more so when we are speaking of a Luciferian harridan like Hillary Rodham Clinton? Her life is one uninterrupted saga of Machiavellian lawlessness: from writing her senior thesis sympathetic to the seminal work of communist and Jewish Luciferian Saul Alinksy, Rules for Radicals – a work of subversion and propaganda which we might otherwise call “word magic,” explicitly dedicated to Lucifer1 – to her concealing her husband’s multitude of affairs and apparent rapes likely for the purpose of safeguarding her own power, to the human sacrifice of Benghazi, to the ever-growing list of people set to testify against her in one case or another dying suddenly under violent and mysterious circumstances, it is apparent to anyone with any moral compass and room temperature IQ that the woman is a fiend. Did I forget to mention that she may be a regular practitioner of necromancy, or at the very least significantly mentally ill? Not to worry, though: she assures us she’s a Christian. Even if her daughter Chelsea claims to have “left the Church” when she was six years old on account of her objection to the institution’s stance against sodomy. As if a six-year-old understood the concepts at issue, and as if she had the latitude to make the decision to leave the Church on her own. Clearly, this departure from the Church was the decision of her parents, and of them, most certainly, her mother.
What other woman of high position might we name whose counter-litigants in case upon case mysteriously have system failure, or fall off the roofs of high-rise buildings, or have their windpipes crushed? Is there anyone outside of organized crime who has had such things befall 76 (!) of their personal adversaries and close acquaintances? Stalin, or Nero, perhaps?
Speaking in terms of sheer body count, she, having not yet even attained the purple, has more blood on her hands than did Jezebel or Salome. In sheer body count she may already even surpass Bloody Mary, against whom John Knox famously contended.
And does not Knox’s reprimand of Britain apply with all the more force in our case? If Britain was short on ministers to stand against the queens, America is even more shorthanded for want of Knox himself. Where now is the man of God to thunder against this she-devil before she can launch into what promises to be a reign of terror?
By this point, everyone from Fox to the Washington Post is admitting Hillary not only breached national security protocols, but also lied about those actions repeatedly to Congress, the American people, the Press, and the FBI. The latter, of course, is the same felony for which the same FBI director – Comey – put Martha Stewart away.
Now WikiLeaks has divulged what we all otherwise surmised – that Clinton was funneling weapons to ISIS through the State Department, and that she had been lying under oath about it the whole time. Add to it all that she has pledged to do just as John Knox forecast women rulers to do – ‘[bring] the nation to confusion and bondage to strangers.’ As bad as Obama has been, the prospect of a Hillary presidency promises worse things to come – total overthrow, if not erasure, of the nation.
The very fact that she is allowed in the running for president testifies to exactly how far down the path of overthrow we already are. But laying aside the possibility that God may strike her down any moment, any conclusion to her career which does not end on death row will be not only a total miscarriage of justice, but an existential threat to the White race on this continent. And by this point, everyone knows it.
- Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals, Dedication, PDF p. 4 ↩