In the wake of the 2016 presidential election we find ourselves beset on all sides by a familiar and rising clamor — minorities of every breed professing dread Fear: fear of racism, discrimination, and oppression at the hands of straight White Christians. You know how “those people” are.
Van Jones even recently described White people’s apparent second thoughts about national suicide as a nightmare which made minorities “afraid of breakfast.” They’re afraid illegal aliens might no longer be allowed to run our law enforcement agencies. They are afraid that White people might begin thinking they have rights like other people.
Whether or not Trump delivers on his campaign promises, the coalition of the aggrieved see his ascent as representative of something larger and much more ominous: a growing rejection of White guilt marking a return to “the bad old days” before White people were pledged to our own dispossession, subjugation, and extinction. The idea that Whites might actually begin to object to pariahdom and genocide is, to hear minorities, perverts, and anti-Christs tell it, terrorism and catastrophe on nothing less than an apocalyptic scale.
From the perspective of Liberaldom, White people preferring not to be marginalized to extinction in the country we built is a uniquely pathetic psychological dysfunction known as “White Fragility” amid “White Supremacy,” the greatest crime possible – at least next to Christo-Supremacy.
But the prospect that we might not continue on our downward spiral according to plans elicits nothing short of hysteria in their heathen hearts. Thus highlighting the double standard with respect to fear. For Black, Brown, heathen, and pervert fear, especially opposite the White Christian, is always presumed legitimate; meantime, White fear is always illegitimate. For Whites, absent some mitigating factor like gender dysphoria, or conversion to Islam, Judaism, or the like, the validity of one’s fear is judged entirely upon melanin content. Yes, it really seems precisely this superficial, as the devotees to this perspective also insist that the White race, qua race, does not and never has actually existed except as a social construct. If granted, then there is no way out of the conclusion that from their vantage, fair complexion invalidates personhood – not due a lack of agency, but just the opposite: because White people are seen as having hyper-agency via “White Privilege” and “White Supremacy.” From this perspective, Whites’ assumed supremacy and privilege means our personhood must be artificially suppressed below that of animals, as there is no negative stigma attached to fear in animals. Whites can only be categorized in the minority mind as the Philistines looked on the blinded and shackled Samson, a titan hobbled and demoralized to the level of kine for the vengeful glee of his enemies.
Under these conditions, if a White expresses fear, the typical PC response is mockery, intimidation, and greater violence by multicult thugs which, as Ike’s deployment of the 101st Airborne against White school children drove home, include government thugs.
The same holds with respect to anger: White anger is always either mocked and dismissed or, alternately, depicted as the darkest and most nefarious phenomenon in human experience. White anger is always treated either as a joke, or the clear and present threat to America, the West, and the World. But minority anger, no matter how absurd the rationale behind it, is presumed to come from a place of moral superiority and vindication. The liberal consensus is ironclad: “Black rage is never irrational“; “Black rage is righteous anger on a Biblical scale“; or as media maven Sally Kohn quoted affirmingly, “Black rage is justified rage.”
But it is precisely this damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don’t false dilemma which the multicult thrusts upon us: first they contemptuously accuse us of fear — fear of dark skin and of competition with people who we’re assured are our inherent betters — in which case we are mocked and derided as weak and pathetic. In this vein, they also hold us in contempt for being straight-lace goody-two-shoes because it holds up such an unpleasant mirror of comparison to them. But if we object to those terms, professing ourselves unafraid, they turn on a dime to characterize us as full of rage and seething with hate of minorities, in which case they denounce us as conscienceless and inhuman. And their cultural Marxist worldview admits no third option. If Whites are perceived as harboring the slightest reservations about the rapacious demands of minorities in any capacity or degree, we must be consumed with either fear or hate. Whichever of these badges is assigned any given White, minorities assume a reflexive inverse posture to the emotional state they have attributed to said White. That is, if a White is deemed afraid of Blacks, in the muticult mind that status sanctions all contempt, anger, and hatred against said White. If an old White man is deemed fearful of rampant Black violence, that is all the justification needed to bring said violence on him. And if a White woman is afraid of sexual assault by Blacks, on that basis she is said to “deserve” the very gang rape she fears. And despite all this denying the dignity, personhood, equality, freedom of conscience, and freedom from racial discrimination – which are all bulwarks of their vaunted human rights doctrine – on the part of White people, Liberaldom pronounces this ravening reaction to White fear wholly righteous. Once Whites repudiate the fear which Liberals insist we carry, and are subsequently informed that that relegates us to a status of anger and hatemongering, it effects an inverse reaction on the part of minorities again, and they wail to the skies that they live in perpetual terror of White night-riders and Aryan vigilantes, and that White people’s continuance deprives all minorities of their dignity. But rather than indicting them, as we are assured both fear and anger do us, those same emotions are said to strangely justify minorities and all their crimes against us.
The obnoxious absurdity and moral obtuseness of it notwithstanding, their position is not new. It was just so when Sanballat the Horonite and Tobiah the Ammonite were terrified and grieved to see that “there was come a man to seek the welfare of the children of Israel” (Neh. 2:10). Those heathen races assembled against Israel likewise felt entirely justified in their wrath at Israel’s healing. The common denominator between ancient Israel and Whites in America – and everywhere else, really – is that both, by stewardship of the covenant, represent Christ to the world. This is what terrified and vexed the conglomeration of heathens, perverts, and sundry races then, and what incenses them still today. Even in Israel’s apostatized state coming out of Babylonian captivity, and ours under the present hegemony of cultural Marxism, we, like Israel of old, signify Christ’s Kingdom to the world. Even if he is one of the most nominal cultural Christians to obtain the office, by contrast to the multicult succubus Hillary, Trump still vaguely betokens the Occidental civilization the horde thought overthrown forever. So wailing and gnashing of teeth ensue throughout Liberaldom. But for all the remorseless rage against the Kingdom and her latter stewards, the sons of Japheth, we are consoled by the inspired words of one of her former watchmen: “Surely the wrath of man shall praise Thee” (Ps. 76:10). Wherein we are reminded that even the psycho-sorceries and ritual violence wielded against us by the servants of darkness in high places as well as low ultimately bring glory to God. For, at length, this process itself is evidently a providential “pressing of the antithesis” and a proof of “the impossibility of the contrary,” or as Milton explained, the means to “justify the ways of God to men” (Paradise Lost, stanza 1, Bk. 1). Because no matter their pretensions to the contrary, fear of the ambassadors of truth and hatred of the representatives of good do not vindicate, but self-condemn.
| Tweet |
|
|
|
