Whites Should Not Seek Belonging in Orthodoxy
Rome Is Not the White Man’s Home
There Is No Place in the Alt Right for Mormonism
Since its inception, Islam has been an enemy of Christian, Western civilization. Many of the countries that today bow to Allah do so because they were conquered by Muslims attacking Western civilization. A simple glance at the map of the ancient Roman Empire, compared with a map of present-day Muslim nations, shows this. Turkey, the Balkan nations Albania, Kosovo, and Bosnia, all of the North African nations including Egypt, and the Islamic heartland of Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, and Iran used to be populated by Christians and whites.
We can’t forget that for seven centuries Muslims conquered and ruled most of Spain, and that they invaded and conquered much of Eastern Europe in the medieval era, with their reach extending as far westward as the gates of Vienna. They forced white Christians to live in misery for centuries in places like Greece and Serbia. Whole nations of whites suffered under non-white Muslims, and millions of white men, women, and children were sold into sexual and cruel slavery by Muslims. These Islamic anti-white tendencies go back centuries, as documented in Giles Milton’s book about the white slave trade, White Gold.
In White Gold author Giles Milton gives a vivid account of the white slave trade, based on letters and manuscripts that survived from the time, several written by slaves. In one account Milton describes how in July 1625 a fleet of over twenty ships manned with Barbary pirates arrived in the thick sea mist and headed up the coast of Cornwall. . . . The manuscript of a Cornish boy from Penryn named Thomas Pellow who was captured at sea in 1715 at the age of 11, which Milton quotes in his book, offers valuable insight into the persecution of the white slaves. . . . In 1737 at the age of 33, after 23 years in captivity Pellow managed a successful escape.
He explained that one of the Sultan’s many perverted pastimes was to marry off his slaves. He was particularly fond of mulattos or mixed race slaves and started his own “breeding programme”, matching white male slaves with black North African women while white women slaves were incarcerated in his harem and forced to breed. He would line up his slaves and citizens and call out “that one, take that one”.
The British and European families of the captured slaves begged the church, the crown and associated authorities in their respective countries for help, but often met with a callous lack of concern.
The white slave trade continued well into the 1800s when the United States of America, Britain and several European nations finally came together and fought and won two wars against the Barbary pirates.
In more recent years, we have experienced a rash of Islamic terrorist attacks in the West as the Islamic jihad once again presses westward and northward into Europe and North America.
Today 1.7 billion people, or a quarter of the global population, worship Allah and proclaim Muhammad as his final prophet. The vast majority of them are ethnically black, Arab, or come from other Asian ethnicities.
Notwithstanding all of these facts, for some white people the weakness of Christian, Western institutions has been reason enough for them to do as Osama bin Laden said Westerners would do when faced with the rise of aggressive Islam and the self-destruction of the West. They have picked the seemingly stronger horse: Islam.
For our purposes, this article serves simply to document why a few white nationalists have made this choice, and why it is a plainly impractical one for white people hoping to find succor during our anti-white era. As with the previous installments of this series of brief surveys of religious institutions, my goal has been simply to answer the question: is there a religious institution that will accept and support pro-white people? Not in theory or based on some centuries-old concept or verse, but in practice here and now.
With Islam, the answer is overwhelmingly no. Clearly the whole of lslamic history runs contrary to Western civilization. But as egregious as those wrongs have been, the purpose of this article is not to relitigate past wrongs. The question is whether Islamic institutions are tolerant of, or supportive of, whites today who are unashamed of their racial heritage and want to protect it.
No. As a matter of political expediency, Islam in the United States is anti-white. National groups such as the Islamic Circle of North America and Islamic Society of North America have clearly come out on the side of social justice warriors, the Left, and the #BlackLivesMatter movement, even when Muslims are not directly involved. They are using it as a means to their end of conquest. Ergo, no appeal to principle would make a difference (as members of other religious institutions have experienced and previous articles have noted). Insofar as principles are involved, like other SJW religious institutions they have picked the verses that justify an anti-racist/anti-white, pro-#BlackLivesMatter agenda.
In practice, the masses of Muslims are incredibly anti-white and anti-Western. Every facet of white, Western society that has been touched by Muslims has been to that extent unwhitened and dewesternized. Inordinate respect and fear towards non-whites in general, including non-white Muslims in particular, has made wretches out of otherwise genetically gifted and capable Europeans. Take for example the Norwegian politician who was raped by a Somali “refugee” and then felt white guilt over the Somali’s deportation. Here’s his white guilt, in his own Norwegian words.
The one thing that Islam has going for it these days is its support for aggressive, masculine behavior. Granted, there are plenty of “moderate” or SJW-aligned Muslims who will make NAXALT arguments and try to explain why “real Islam” is not what bin Laden, the Taliban, and the Wahhabis who run Saudi Arabia say it is. But these are the same people who also explain away the incredible rape epidemic of white Europeans by non-white, Muslim men. These Leftists lie and are not logical. The facts on the ground disprove their arguments. Islam is violent and male-oriented, and even if that violence is bounded, it is aggressive, both towards unbelievers and towards women.
Some white women are particularly attracted to non-white Muslim men who have religious sanction to forcibly control their women. For white women who have led a degenerate, self-willed life, this brings them a measure of peace and fulfillment they never knew they always wanted.
Sadly, many white men (churched or unchurched) have no idea how to live out their masculinity in relation to women. They are one-trick ponies who merely give in to “the boss,” i.e., the woman. Feminism has driven that idea into the heads of men, and inflated white women with a sense of entitlement, to the detriment of white men, women, and children. Feminism is thus a truly cancerous, evil force in Western civilization. In contrast to this situation, Islam can be appealing insofar as it is a saner option than Left-wing degeneracy. Because of this, some white nationalists have looked to Islam for inspiration to explain how they’d like white men to lead white women: white sharia. (*Note that these members of the Alt Right do not advocate converting to Islam.)
Islam looks strong only in comparison to feminism, however. Compared to Western Christianity, all its weaknesses stand out and its strengths disappear. Strong male leadership and female submission are par for the course in traditional Christianity. A rebirth of biblical, male-dominated families would make Islam no longer an appealing alternative to the limp-wristed, soy latte-drinking, beta orbiters at your local megachurch. Instead, white women could swoon at white Christian men who no longer fear either the fair sex or angry black thugs, and who live for a purpose greater than themselves, which includes loving and leading one woman and the prolific offspring they produce. Strong Christian white men would do things like this routinely in a pro-white world. We need religious institutions that support and facilitate such behavior. Islam does not offer us what we need in the here and now — or the hereafter.