Two days ago, GreenBaggins (Lane Keister) put up a post refuting Christian Identity while calling it Kinism. Understandably, we entered the debate in the comments section to set the record straight. Today, the comments are now locked on that post, and another post was put up (comments are locked on it as well) saying that “uncalm, irrational folks desired to derail fruitful discussion,” leading to the locking of comments. Scroll down to the bottom of the discussion to see which side was actually increasingly “uncalm, irrational,” and, might I even say, ugly. Apparently Lane thought that he could, either out of laziness or dishonesty, slander us without being answered and be able to claim an easy victory; well, that didn’t work out like he had expected. In fact, he stopped posting in the thread completely after I answered his false Gnostic dichotomy which emphasized the spiritual so as to negate the physical. His claim that his “patience was running out” is disingenuous from a man who has made 385 posts on the topic of the Federal Vision over the past 7 years. But he decides to slander Kinism of his own accord, and suddenly he’s tired of it after a single post and two days of discussion? And apparently, “profitable discussion” is code for “winning the debate”, in which case, I agree that there wasn’t much of that going on for his side. This is just another example of how the only way Alienists can “win” debates is by banning, deleting, and locking to prevent the debate from even taking place.
| Tweet |
|
|
|
