Anders Behring Breivik

July 26, 2011 Current Events, Demographics, Europe, Europeans, Foreign Policy, Ideology, Immigration, Middle Easterners, Politics, Race, The West Print Page

 

At 3:22 PM CEST (9:22 AM EST) on Friday, July 22, 2011, a car bomb exploded outside the Regjeringskvartalet in Oslo, Norway.  The Regjeringskvartalet is a collection of Norwegian governmental buildings, including the office of the Norwegian Prime Minister.  The explosion damaged large portions of the buildings, killing 8 and injuring 30.  About an hour and a half later, a man dressed as a police officer opened fire on participants of a Labour Party youth camp on the island of Utøya, killing 69 and injuring 66.  Norwegian police then arrested this man, who turned out to be 32-year-old Anders Behring Breivik, an ethnic Norwegian.  Breivik has admitted to committing both attacks.

As soon as it was confirmed that the attacker was an ethnic Norwegian instead of one of their pet minorities, the media delightedly fell all over themselves to label the attacker as a “conservative Christian” and a “right-wing extremist.”  Wikipedia describes him as a “nationalist” and a “right-wing extremist.”1  Due to the media’s mislabeling of Jared Loughner as a right-wing extremist and anti-Semite, when he was in fact a left-wing Jew, I was immediately suspicious of these claims — and it turns out I was correct.  The claim that he was a conservative Christian is based largely2 on a brand new Facebook page, which appears immediately after the attacks, displaying “conservative” and “Christian” as his beliefs.  Putting aside this laughably convenient fact, common sense would indicate that anyone interested in politics and religion enough to write a 1,500 page manifesto might have something more descriptive than those generic terms.  For example, I have “Reformed Protestant” and, half-jokingly, “Farther Right-Wing Than You” as my religious and political beliefs on my Facebook page; and most of my friends who are interested in those subjects have similarly descriptive labels as well.  Beyond this anecdotal evidence, when we look at his manifesto, we see a belief in Darwinism, rationalism, and a nebulous cultural Christianity, but no profession of the Christian religion itself:

As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science, and it must always continue to be that way. Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic.

…

It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a ‘Christian fundamentalist theocracy’ (everything we do not want) and a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want). So no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)).

…

I’m not going to pretend I’m a very religious person, as that would be a lie, I’ve always been very pragmatic and influenced by my secular surroundings and environment.3

 

He may have some residual cultural Christianity, but he is not a Christian — and certainly not a “Christian fundamentalist,” as some of the media is claiming.  Further, he is a Freemason, which puts him even more at odds with true Christianity.

The claims that he is “far-right” or a “right-wing extremist” are false as well.  He certainly has some right-of-center views; however, when you really examine them, you see that they are not truly right-wing.  Breivik is staunchly pro-homosexual, pro-civic nationalism, and pro-Israel.  He is extremely opposed to Islam, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism, and the Frankfurt School, in addition to ethnocentrism and “racism.”  In fact, he comes right out and says, “[W]e have to ensure that we influence other culturally [sic] conservatives to take our anti-racist, pro-homosexual, pro-Israeli line of thought.”  Not only does this have little in common with my own right-wing Christian ethnonationalism, but it is filled with internal contradictions.  For example, his support for homosexuality puts him in the position of opposing Christianity and supporting cultural Marxism.  Being opposed to both multiculturalism and ethnocentrism, in favor of civic nationalism, is an untenable position, most especially in a multiracial country.  Further, as Kevin MacDonald points out, Breivik correctly rails against cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School as playing a leading role in the destruction of Europe, but ignores the fact that these are disproportionately Jewish creations; he has internalized the schizophrenia of neoconservatism, irrationally choosing to support the ethnocentrism of Israel and Zionism, while denying the legitimacy of ethnocentrism among his own people. A rational nationalist would not support Jewish ethnocentrism to deal with Islam in Israel unless such support were reciprocated by the Jewish community in Western countries.  Instead, Jewish groups have been at the forefront of denigrating the moral legitimacy of European nationalism while hypocritically supporting ethnocentrism for Israel.  Indeed, Brevik had internalized neoconservatism so thoroughly that it is now apparent that the Labour Party’s opposition to Israel and the Utøya youth camp’s recent endorsement of Palestinian statehood are very likely reasons that they were targeted.4

"Boycott Israel" banner at Labour Party youth camp.

 

Labour Party youth with Palestinian flags.

Additionally, Breivik’s attacks fall on the 65th anniversary of the Zionist King David Hotel bombing, and Breivik was a regular poster on a neoconservative Zionist website.

The man who runs it is a Billy Kristol style neo-con. It is called document.no and run by Hans Rustad, a Jewish man. Rustad is a former left-wing journalist turned neo-conservative. The website claims that only Muslim immigration should be restricted and that Asians and non-Muslim Africans are “making a positive contribution to Norway.” The website fanatically supports Israel and opposes Norwegian recognition of Palestinian statehood.5

Cultural Christianity, civic nationalism, anti-racism, and Zionism mixed with anti-Islam is the ideology of neoconservativism, not the ideology of the far right.  Breivik was basically a liberal Republican, not a right-wing nationalist.  If Breivik and I had ever met, it is almost certain that we would have been completely unable to work together towards any political goals due to our opposing ideological foundations.

His neocon beliefs notwithstanding, Breivik did have some things correct.  Islam and cultural Marxism are extreme dangers to traditional European culture, Christianity, and the European peoples.  He also correctly identifies the enemies of the West as not only the third world immigrants, but also our own elites who have crammed multiculturalism, cultural Marxism, Islamization, and mass third world immigration down our collective throats.

Moreover, I will not denounce political violence as inherently wrong. There are times when violence is completely legitimate for the achievement of political ends.  That being said, I do not believe that Breivik’s actions fall into this category. When violence is legitimate and when it is not will be covered in detail in the future in my ongoing Vindiciae series, so I won’t address it at length here. However, I want to make clear that I do not endorse what Breivik did.  He is a murderer.

While I cannot approve, I can certainly understand why he did it.  Before the 1970s, Norway had very little immigration.  Starting with refugees from Cambodia and Vietnam in the 1970s, the rate of entry and number of  immigrants has continued to increase.6  Norway currently has over 300,000 non-Western immigrants (plus another 200,000 immigrants from other European countries).7  These immigrants are concentrated in the cites; for example, Oslo, Norway is 27% immigrant and Drammen Norway is 22% immigrant.8  For the past five years in a row, 100% of all violent rapes committed in Oslo were committed by non-white immigrants, primarily against ethnic Norwegians.9  The current governing coalition lead by the Labour Party has greatly accelerated this, letting in 143,000 immigrants from 2005 to 2009, or a total increase of 41%.10  As we can see, we have a man who has watched the city were he grew up, Oslo, turn into something unrecognizable by thousands of non-white immigrants who brutalize white women and seek to impose Islam on his country. All of this is supported by his own political ruling class and against his wishes.  Breivik’s targets were not random.  The building in front of which he blew up a car housed the Labour Party’s Prime Minister, and the youth camp he shot up contained the next generation of Labour Party elites. I am not condoning his actions, but he is definitely not insane as some people, including his lawyer, are claiming.  As Hunter Wallace put it:

Anders Behring Breivik isn’t a lunatic. This isn’t an obvious schizophrenic in the mold of Jared Loughner.

This is someone who clearly understands the gravity of the situation and who was disturbed enough by what is being done to his country and his civilization to take matters into his own hands.

…

As Whites are pushed into minority status in Europe and America by their own “leadership,” it is inevitable that people like Anders “The Incorruptible” Breivik here will start fighting back. This is what the French Revolution looked like when Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette lost their heads.

The treasonous Western elites have pushed us, and pushed us, and pushed us. Did they really think that they could go on doing that indefinitely with no blowback?  The elites and the media are already clamoring to take away more of our peoples’ gun rights, free speech, and freedom of assembly in the wake of these attacks; but that will only make things worse.  Everyone has a breaking point, and the more they push us into an ethnocidal corner, the more people are going to snap.  When liberal Republicans and neoconservatives like Breivik start snapping, then the elites definitely have something to worry about.

 

Footnotes
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik ↩
  2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2017851/Norway-attacks-gunman-Anders-Behring-Breivik-right-wing-extremist-hated-Muslims.html ↩
  3. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=325765 ↩
  4. http://www.sott.net/articles/show/232317-Norway-Youth-Camp-Just-Endorsed-Palestinian-State ↩
  5. http://cofcc.org/2011/07/norwegian-killer-facebook-hoax/ ↩
  6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Norway ↩
  7. http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/02/01/10/innvbef_en/tab-2011-04-28-04-en.html ↩
  8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Norway ↩
  9. http://cofcc.org/2011/05/non-whites-immigrants-continue-to-commit-all-rapes-in-oslo/ ↩
  10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Norway ↩

Print Page

About Nathanael Strickland

Nathanael Strickland is the owner and chief editor of FaithandHeritage.com. He was born in Dallas, TX, grew up in upstate SC, and now resides in SE TX. He received both his BS in Political Science with a minor in Economics and his MBA from Clemson University and now works in project management, SEO, and web design. He has ancestors who fought with the patriots in the American Revolution, with the Texans at the Alamo, and with the Confederacy in the War for Southern Independence. You can reach him by email at editor [at] faithandheritage.com.

Related Posts

    • No Related Post
  • http://bclaym@wordpress.com Brandon

    Good article. The treasonous western elites are mentally insane themselves and are the adulterers the Spirit spoke of in Rev.2:20-23 of Jezebel. She is the never ending demanding, lesbian dyke spirit, the all encompassing mommy who “refuses to abide in her house”; ie her proper role. She “wills not to repent” so she is “cast into a bed ” and “her children are slain with death”.

    This system can only be stopped by a like dominating MALE spirit of violence such as in this incident. “Vessels of wrath fitted for destruction”…Rom. 9.

  • Betty the Beastlover

    This guy’s all over the lot, almost incoherent, and the mainstream media, at least where I live, sure don’t know what to do about it. I predict they’ll continue to lie their faces off about Breivik’s real beliefs.

  • http://religionnewsblog.blogspot.com Justin

    He is not incoherent, quite the opposite. He is a deep and systematic thinker.

    Nor is he pro-homosexual. He explicitly seeks a return to traditional morality, as well as strong patriarchy.

    He would, however, permit sexual immorality in “free city zones”, but strictly regular hedonistic cultural displays elsewhere. A nifty solution, really.

    He may be a cultural Christian by person faith, but the preservation of Christian culture is his cause, he is explicitly Christian in the cultural sense. His entire political program defines Christianity as the “in group”.

  • Doug

    From comment at Sailer’s blog:

    I wonder whether Breivik’s “anti-racism” was merely a front.

    Breivik IS a race realist. I suspect that he has at least 150 pages in his manifesto on race. I also suspect that he read HBD blogs.

    Go to his manifesto and do a search for ‘genotype’ or ‘nordic’ or ‘race-mixing’ or ‘genes’.

    This from his manifesto suggests he cared about race:

    “In any case, we need to get over this taboo as soon as possible because it is estimated that the Nordic genotypes will be extinct completely within 200 years. This is mainly due to intermarriage between Nordics and non-Nordics. Multiculturalist doctrines have speeded this “indirect extermination process” up further in many Western European countries so the extinction might happen sooner. F example the Norwegian cultural Marxist government has created a vast network of asylum camps all over the country
    (and in historically isolated small towns and villages) which will contribute to accelerate this process substantially. The Nordic genotypes might be wiped out within 200 years and yet not a single counter-measure has been employed to prevent this from happening due to the fact that it is considered politically incorrect.”

  • Doug

    Regarding Breivik’s zionism:

    From email:

    Was Breivik’s “zionism” merely a front?

    So says blogger Conservative Swede: “Any [European] white right-wing group critical of MC/PC/Immigration/Islam must protect itself from Nazi charges by putting the support of Israel and the Jewish people among its top objectives.”

    http://conswede.blogspot.com/2011/07/nazification-spells-and-philosemitic.html

  • http://religionnewsblog.blogspot.com Justin

    His support of Israel is not a front, but he is certainly not a Zionist in any primary sense of personal identity or values. Yes, he supports removing Muslims from Israel, but he also intends to remove Muslims from Europe, Turkey, Syria, and Egypt!

    He devotes a number of pages (1368-1373) to specifically address various angles on “the Jewish Question”, and frankly he is quite reasonable about it.

    He acknowledges the Jews are disporportionately liberal and Marxist, but when your goal is the assassination of all Marxist leaders, why discriminate, really? He acknowleges the contributions of a number of conservative Jews, and in the end, the existential threat to the European culture comes from Muslims, not Jews.

    His supposed “Zionism front” is ridiculous, if you stop to think about it for even a second. His motvation is NOT to gain public support or appease anyone. His motivation is to sacrifice his own life in order to bring awareness to the problem and to inspire future violent resistance.

    Those who say he is acting for the Jews are engaged in massive psychological projection.

  • Joshua K.

    A couple of points that I believe can be validly made on the subject against the ignorance about the issue that we have seen in the media (and for the record, I am giving a description of his views in the piece below, not an endorsement to said views). The basic fact of life is that most of the time violence by anyone (conservative, Marxist, liberal, anarchist etc.) promoting their viewpoint is counterproductive and will often rightfully meet with public outrage. This is exactly what Breivik’s shooting up of the labour party youth wing will end up being in the advancement of his views.

    Breivik is pro Israel (it is one of his seven major political points), but is against liberal jewish groups (classifying some of them as class a/b traitors which he would execute if he could). He denounces the idea that a ZOG like entity of jewish elites controls everything in the document, though he also recognizes that there are liberal jews and denounces them. He supports that current state of Israel and the current prime minister. He states in the manifesto that he supports the rebuilding of the Solomon’s temple on the site of the dome of the rock (which would pretty much immediately plunge the west into a war with all Muslim countries as the dome of the rock is their most sacred site). He sees this as the fulfillment of Ezekiel 41-42 and I guess that is the standard templar take on it. The templar writings that he includes do not agree with the idea of animal sacrifices, but with the idea of brotherly love and good works being the sacrifices to be performed in the new temple guarded by the knights Templers. He mentions that he was kicked off of stormfront and several other WN forums for debating in favor of conservative jews against the typical opinions offered at those sorts of sites. He views the jewish people as a whole as part of the bulwark against muslim imperialism.

    He denounces explicitly in the document adolf Hitler and the nazi party in general (classifying it as a main evil alongside communism/Marxism and multiculturalism). He classifies it as being very evil and supports the full numbers of holocaust victims. However, He notes that the term nazi is thrown around too much and is a parody of a term which does not fit those it denotes. Breivik also states that the holocaust is often used as a tool of multiculturalism. Some of the controversy about his alleged neo-nazi connections are explained in the manifesto. He believes that most (60-80%) neo-nazis are neo-nazi just to go against the general current and can be worked with. He does not believe that the 20% hardcore Nazis can be worked with and says that they should be rejected.

    His major point is of course being very anti-muslim; however this is a religious issue more than a racial issue as he supports the Christian minorities in muslim nations. In doing so, he states that he believes it possible for Christians to work with jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs etc. against the threat of Islam. He denounces non white immigration and spends some time promoting the idea of the Nordic sub-race. He denounces pro multi-culturalist and pro immigration groups as anti-nordic racists. He notes the tendency of minorities to vote liberal on the major issues and proceeds to argue against their presence in Norway on that and genetic groups. The templar organization that he is either a part of or created is on the other hand open to Christians of different races and mixed race persons who prove themselves, so you can see that the media is completely overreacting on the issue of his racist views. He isn’t just a mindless raving anti muslim either, he has hundreds of pages devoted to historical issues ranging from the crusades to the Islamic conquests to the turks, modern time crime statistics of muslims in the western countries, current muslim assaults against Christianity (copts, southern Sudanese etc.) etc. Needless to say, he believes that he has the facts of his side to promote his beliefs. Notably, he believes that muslims should be offered the chance to freely leave Europe before being expelled and that any who take this course of action should be given a kilogram of gold as compensation.

    Breivik rejected random attacks upon muslims in his manifesto as he says that it would work the opposite way that he wanted it to. In his conception of revolution, he has different phases that he sees it being accomplished in. He considered himself a part a operative assassinating political enemies whereas most of part a is the dissemination of information within the law according to his views. He then had phase b, phase c etc. where france would be the first country to rid itself of muslims via an internal way and a military coup and Russia under Putin would be the natural ally. Conflict with anglo-sphere headed by the Americans would come and it would require a union of European states to defeat the Americans.

    Morality wise, breivik is mostly pro traditional morality coming out in support of anti-imperialism, pro-Christendom (non theocratic form), anti-abortion (with the exception of rape, incest, life of the mother and severe fetal deformity), pro-patriarchy, anti-drug, pro Nordic school of economics and anti-marxist ideas. There are some odd diary entries that are out of line with his general views where he states that he had sex with two Hungarian prostitutes while attempting to meet up with an arms dealer in a brothel to purchase and ak-47. Odd when he had denounced rampant sexual promiscuity earlier in the section on his political/moral ideals.

    In the manifesto, he listed his Christianity as “moderate” contra the media presentation as a “fundamentalist” (which is of course a codeword for conservative in media speak). His main focus with Christianity is upon the cultural elements of Christianity in Christendom and a doctrine of divine empowerment which sounds like an old knights templar doctrine or something to that effect. His manifesto contains some mention of freemasonry (apparently he was a level 4 mason), but contains a lot more about the knight’s Templers including some medieval templar writings.

    I don’t see the need to claim mk-ultra, neo-conservative Zionist cell etc. here. The targeted building and group, the prime ministers office and the teen/young adult wing of the youth party (made up of the children of politicians and others who were being groomed to take positions in the party) are fairly consistent with the groups he said he wished to target and blamed for wrecking Norway. The labour party from their political platform is quite liberal arguing for multiculturalism, pro-abortion (rather ironic to put it mildly), affirmative action in the Norwegian churches (more female preachers specifically), religious pluralism, global climate change regulation etc. You can look over it here: http://arbeiderpartiet.no/Kontakt/Information-in-English

    Were he a cell promoting islam, he would have blown up a mosque and killed hundreds of muslims at worship to spark public outcry. Such a course of action is discouraged by him as articulated above. This would have been much more obvious than killing the children of the children of the labour party. I think that we are simply left with a fairly intelligent individual with logistical skills and planning knowledge with a lot of anger over the current situation in Norway who acted upon that anger.
    The media will of course use this story to denounce WN organizations in the same way that they used the Oklahoma city bombing. Fine, they can rant about this and I propose that they get out the statistics upon the wars that the neoconservative/liberal run governments of the west have been involved with in the past few decades. Fact of the matter is, almost all white nationalists have denounced Breivik’s actions. To put this in perspective too, what about the civilian bombing of the NATO forces? Weekly we hear of a dozen civilians or more being killed by American so called “smart weapons”, yet there is not any major media outcry over these deaths. Libya actually has had some specialized clinics/hospitals for young people struggling with cancer destroyed by bombing in libya. Many many thousands of civilians have lost their lives being bombed by western air forces. This can’t be denied and let us not even mention the many abortion deaths. So, the media focuses upon what it wishes to promote for its agenda rather than for strictly moral reasons.

    Ultimately, that is what they will exploit this situation for, more power and more control over the citizens. Fact of the matter is, blond haired, blue eyed, 6’3 Mr. Breivik has given them the perfect propaganda boogeyman to throw at us. Fact of the matter is, the media which is normally racially blind has been throwing out tons of racial descriptions of this guy, even the Nordic label that they despise to bring out so much has been tossed around liberally. His decision to kill the labour party teens is going to backfire on his ideals majorly.

  • http://religionnewsblog.blogspot.com Justin

    This is a fantastic analysis, Joshua. I only have one small point of correction I would offer:

    According to him, the purpose of his terrorism is NOT to gain recruits, therefore it is inaccurate to say that his decision to target teens is going to backfire on his ideals.

    His stated reason for terrorism is to terrify and punish his Leftist enemies. In fact, he specifically rejects the idea of supporting right wing political parties, because they provide “false hope”.

    Thus, alienating the general public from right wing political parties is perfectly fulfilling is ideals, majorly.

Switch to our mobile site